auto greet 4 users
mIRC Code
+ 1 likes
Please Register to submit score.
| Average Score | 2.3 |
| Scores Submitted | 3 |
| Date Added | May 12, 2007 |
| Last Updated | May 12, 2007 |
| Tags | greet greets here personal user |
|
Introduction
where i put your channel change to your channel
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 12, 2007 2:44 am
Posted on May 12, 2007 2:44 am
Missing a closing bracket "}" at the end of the On Join event.
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 12, 2007 12:30 pm
Posted on May 12, 2007 12:30 pm
I would remove the * from in front of *!greet*. If someone is trying to tell another chatter what the command is and says something like:
Type !greet greet here
Then it would save greet here as the persons greet who is trying to explain it.
Type !greet greet here
Then it would save greet here as the persons greet who is trying to explain it.
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 12, 2007 12:32 pm
Posted on May 12, 2007 12:32 pm
Also (and I am not sure on this point) in the second on join event you use [ $+ [ $nick ] ], but in the first one you only use $nick. Will it misread itself?
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 14, 2007 11:38 am
Posted on May 14, 2007 11:38 am
super ew...
The first line nes a ; BADLY.
The Second on JOIN is missing a bracket.
3rd, Whycan't you just use # or *????
The first line nes a ; BADLY.
The Second on JOIN is missing a bracket.
3rd, Whycan't you just use # or *????
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 14, 2007 2:51 pm
Posted on May 14, 2007 2:51 pm
its the greet i have @ www.chat4life.org and it works fine in chase's~Chat come visit me some time ill help u there!
mIRC Snippet:
auto greet 4 users
Posted on May 15, 2007 1:15 am
Posted on May 15, 2007 1:15 am
I don't think we need help with this... the comments above are ones that should be heeded. Also look at how other people have used a general # in their codes and where they have sought to limit the channels they have further incorporated lines that allow channels to be put in. Other than the "errors" I get the distinct feeling I have seen a close proximity to this coding elsewhere....
