Anyways jackster35-1 its a good code and keep up the good work

No problem Jethro, all's forgiven. :)

lol @ that was kinda gay....
hahahaha yeah it was but it was funny..
Jethro don't let people get to you so much learn to let go...
much love an peace be with you....

My apologies, jackster, for turning your thread into a sideshow. I admit that I seriously need to reevaluate my outburst toward another person, because I haven't a clue as yet why something one particular person says can easily ticks me off. Incidentally, napa182, that was kinda gay....:/

No problem jackster35-1 keep up the coding ;x

napa182, I wasn't going to delete your comment. I was just pointing out that off topic comments will get deleted.

lol I don't care if you delete my comments at all. It was a joke to them as they always seem to fight over nothing hence the tension between them. Jethro still needs to learn not to let people bug him to the point to keep it going an going tbh.

That's exactly how I learn stuff Jackster35-1.

I look forward to your next script. :)

Hi, Aha2Y, thanks. I also love your scripts, they're amazing. I too might try making a dialog. I'll be using other peoples as examples and try and learn from others. :)

Hi Jackster35-1 nice script :)

Nobody needs to screw each other. At the end of the day, they've had a little "fight" from my point of view and whatever happens between them happens between them. Any comments that stay on topic are acceptable, otherwise I'll remove them. :)

Sorry jackster35-1 to say this on ur comments, but Jethro an Dean should just go screw each other an get it over with all ready as there seems to be a lot of sexual tension between them. jk of course =P

I usually don't like to get into a "dramatic" debate, but it usually takes an ignorant, egotistical person to make capital out of another before this whole thing goes to wrack and ruin.

lol @ napa182's comment about lol @ drama

lol @ drama

You lot have really good scripts, and Jethro, I like the script where it shows the channels as well. But my script is probably the most basic you could get with replying with the number of channels $2 is in. Really liking the replies and debates you lot are having. :)

GEEKFIGHT

Food for entertainment. :)

You just can't help but have a go before telling someone to stop.> stop talking about yourself, and dont be selfishThat's enough of you hypocrisy all in a day's work. I'm out of this mess for the last time.

some folks who'll find any opportune moment to bring you down

all right, stop talking about yourself, and dont be selfish, i think we need to stop this by now, since all subjects are going off topic

I don't consider myself one of the "privileged few." I feel privileged to help out others, but unfortunately there'll always be some folks who'll find any opportune moment to bring you down. The is supposed to be a forum where people encourage each other to be better, not defame or criticize just to boost your own ego.

^^^ an expert comment, totally off topic (ironic)

Sometimes i really think the internet should have some sort of test to qualify for the privileges to use it....

The issue here is this: you want to keep your own pride by disparaging how bad my example is incessantly, and you're going to the extreme. I did admit that failure, while I was patiently waiting for you to draw up the likelihood of my code fallacy, which you finally did so at the very end. Then, Out of nowhere, you told me how I should learn to read -- that was uncalled for.

You did use $calc(), did you not?

Jethro if you already knew, that i would post that, and keep asking that? i think you have serious issues...

Anyway, this is pointless now to further this meaningless debate or debacle.

no that its not pointless, since it will fail, you need to provide a good code, since mine doesnt need the $calc() its still working with that, but yours will keep returning the wrong number for channels

I was waiting for you to show me that, and you failed to do so. Yes, I did my own testing, and it did fail on that scenario.

Please don't tell me how to read when you can't even write a proper sentence yourself.

Lastly, taken from your original example, you still don't need $calc().

Anyway, this is pointless now to further this meaningless debate or debacle.

using $left(%x,1) will fail, if the nick is in 16 channels, it will only return 1.. the right way to do it, is using $gettok

try this, put another nick in 10 other channels

then type !count nick

Nick is in 1 of the same channel(s) I am in, and nick is on: #chan1, #chan2, #chan3,#chan4,#chan5,#chan6,#chan7,#chan8,#chan9,#chan10

your method will only return 1, instead 10
you need to learn how to read, since im repeating the same thing 4 times

Why took you this long to show me your own failure and kept on telling me that mine would fail with "wrong number?"

You still haven't drawn up any scenario that mine will result in fallacy. You gotta give me something concrete, or what you've said to me is nothing but flimsy.

i did realize that fail too, But that didn't establish my acceptance to your nitpicking of it. Also, what are you to do of your own failure?

in the example i posted before, all you need is change 2 to 1

$mid(%y,1,-1)

so it will return the first channel prefix