The reason '!flood on' is not working is because "on *:TEXT:*:#:{" is define before "on *:TEXT:!flood *:#:{" so all text is captured by "on *:TEXT:*:#:{", put simply swap the two on *:TEXT sections around then it will work!

coolbeans :)

Yes Person, when people engage in a text flood and enter more than or equal to 5 lines within 5 seconds, they get three warnings each time until they get kicked/banned at the 4th offense.

So the script that jethro just posted up there ^ , if you copy that and paste it in remotes, does that mean when people flood ,they will get a notice first from the person who is using that script?

tttwebsite wrote:

can you put in warnings please so that it will send a notice to stop doing it like give three warnings thin kick then ban please

No, never once even thought about using twitter. I personally am not a fan of that jazz. :P

Pass, out of curiosity, do you tweet? :/

Jethro_, contrary to what you may think, my comment was quite self-explanatory. The code snippet would just be holding someone's hand through the coding process that obviously already knows a little bit about what they're doing. As for a constructive comment- it's better to explain one's thoughts/ideas out thoroughly, instead of using terms that don't appeal to the masses.
If you find the need to continue this senseless game of comment-tag, just send me a private message. Thanks

Why is that not constructive? You use a generic term to introduce it to those who don't know. Every one of us surely wasn't born to know something until we learn something, correct? God forbid, it's a different story to melodramatically sensitive folks who can't take good comments for bad ones...

Moreover, it's always a good idea to include a code demonstration to show what you mean by what you've said. Many times we say a bunch of things trying to decipher a topic, but only to result misunderstanding or confusion to those who read our posts. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.

Jethro_, because if i simply said "Use dynamic variables" it would defeat the purpose of posting constructive comments, especially if not all users understand the concept. Thanks for the concern though. :)

Okie doke...point taken. :-)

$network isn't guaranteed to be unique; $cid is. and $site is recommended over $wildsite since it's slimmer :P

Pass, why don't you just refer to it as dynamic variable? :P Yeah it's a nice suggestion $+(%,flood,.,#,.,$cid,.,$site) $site is recommended over $nick.

Edited as per jaytea's suggestion

I'd suggest looking into making the (%flood.#chan (and/or %flood.nick)) variable(s) server-specific, instead of just channel/user specific. This will prevent problems if, for example, you're on the channel #Help on two different servers or there's a user on each server with the same nick.

Bielie:

couldve used
if ($1 == !flood) && ($2 == on) {

You can also use regex in the match text section and use the /S modifier.

P.S. I really don't see the point of having two text events when one will do.

that's because of Ctrl+K Ctrl+B and other so you have to use $strip()

I know. Sometimes it doesn't reply to another user. That's what I'm trying to figure out. :)

if the code was loaded in your mIRC that wont play this is ON TEXT event so it's execuse only for other user not u

Yeah Tannn3r. I have the same problem, I'm trying to resolve it. I'll keep you posted. :)
Thanks for the nice comment AlmerC. :)

When I say !flood on nothing happens.

lol nice i agree with WorlDMT but overall this is pretty good. Love ur avatar btw :3

no need to put "1" after /inc and no need to evaluate the identifier when u set a variable just set %var $+ $identifer
u can regroup on text event and use $wildsite is better than $address($nick,0)
remember mode +m and/or +i

Comment/rate/like please :D