Color full text and lots of it

Platform: mIRC

Published Jan 31, 2010

Updated Jan 31, 2010

970 30

A code i made you type /randomise then the words you want :)

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

;; Made by: Jackster35 ;;

;;  do not re-upload   ;;

;; do not take credit  ;;

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

alias randomise {

  /say 1 $1-

  /say 2 $1-

  /say 3 $1-

  /say 4 $1-

  /say 5 $1-

  /say 6 $1-

  /say 7 $1-

  /say 8 $1-

  /say 9 $1-

  /say 10 $1-

  /say 11 $1-

}

Comments

Jethro - Feb 20, 2010

I did post an example of which every letter of a text gets randomized colors, but looking up I've realized it's been deleted. Sorry jack to see you being suffered visually. Truly, you didn't have to endure the pain from lame "bashes" at the expense of posters...you do have the right to hit that delete button.

Respond

jackster35-1 - Feb 20, 2010

:( i realy feel abused on here :(

Respond

Gummo - Feb 16, 2010

Unnecessary comment, not to mention lame. :(

Anyway, I wonder if jackster35-1 tested this script because I definitely wouldn't call it "randomise".

Respond

SnoooP - Feb 15, 2010

Jethro and Napa suck.. Ghost Writer is right and rules....

Did I forget to say I have just took meth/crack/valium/opium/coke/echos/aid needles... and more.

Respond

Kinight - Feb 13, 2010

Lmfao i love reading these trolls. If you guys want to see real trolls check out my snippets with patx, stupid 10 year old noobs. Jackster > Lmfao nice one

Respond

jackster35-1 - Feb 13, 2010

TheNitelyfe has a point

Respond

TheNitelyfe - Feb 08, 2010

CAN WE STOP DISCUSSING THE TOPIC OF INTERNET HATE WOW SERIOUSLY

Respond

[Plornt] - Feb 07, 2010

Yes hate is a strong word, but I generally dont like the way he speaks to people. Im not going to respect him because he tried to show others, including myself, up.

Quote

Stupid plornt :\, I take back liking your multi painting script.

An another example of his stupidity, unliking scripts just becuase he doesnt like the person. If you made a good script, I wouldnt rate it on how I like the person, I would rate it on quality. Also I still remember your comment on my old script "Oh ill rate it higher if you tell me how to make big bold red writing".

So dont call me stupid, look at yourself.

Quote

go get a life [plornt]

I think you missunderstood my "na" i was saying, its not that i dont like yours, its just that we was trying to improove apon, or make alternate versions.

Respond

Jethro - Feb 07, 2010

Hate is too strong of a word, really. But to be respected is to respect other people first by setting up a good example, rather than put people down and act you're all that, and be ostentatious to a point that you refuse to admit that you're wrong. Last but not least, trying to cover up the mistakes that you've made is the shallowest act one can do to degrade his or her own respectfulness. Ghost-writer should know this by heart already...

Respond

DarkCoder - Feb 07, 2010

Hating people you dont even know is shallow, especially on the internet.. Im doing everything hes doing^. And the only reason i like/respect ghost-writer, he makes DECENT (Not great :P) Scripts :).

Respond

Ghost-writer - Feb 07, 2010

Stupid plornt :\, I take back liking your multi painting script.

Respond

jackster35-1 - Feb 07, 2010

go get a life [plornt]

Respond

[Plornt] - Feb 07, 2010

Na where just putting in either smaller version or proving some nub cake (ghost-writer) wrong. It wasnt even funny him edditing his script to try and proove others wrong. I just hate him.

Respond

jackster35-1 - Feb 07, 2010

So you dont like mine?

Respond

Jethro - Feb 04, 2010

'cause ghost-writer always acts like a little snob and his personality sucks.

Respond

DarkCoder - Feb 04, 2010

Funny any thing ghost-writer comments on gets spammed w. replies o.0, half of whitch dont even concern the script.

Respond

napa182 - Feb 02, 2010

yeah yeah you just now whent back and edited ur old comment.. now go cry in ur pillow...

by the way the edit you made is still wrong...

Quote

<napa182> poo
<napa182> -1 poo
<napa182> -2 poo
<napa182> -3 poo
<napa182> -4 poo
<napa182> -5 poo
<napa182> -6 poo
<napa182> -7 poo
<napa182> -8 poo
<napa182> -9 poo
<napa182> -10 poo
<napa182> -11 poo
<napa182> -12 poo
<napa182> -13 poo
<napa182> -14 poo
* Break: command halted

try changing ur dec to inc

Respond

Ghost-writer - Feb 02, 2010

NOOB, AT NO POINT DID I EVER PUT GREATER THAN :@ MY GOD YOU GUYS SOOK. /ME RAGEQUITS

Respond

napa182 - Feb 02, 2010

Jethro_ Said:

Quote

Either you have a copy of mirc that relays your personality or whatever. The judges have spoken and sentenced you guilty, and you should admit it.

I about died laughing at that... thanks Jethro_ you made my day....

Ghost-writer Said:

Quote

eh, while loop.

		Code 			
Alias randomize {
  var %x 1
  while (%x >= 11) {
    msg $chan $+($chr(3),%x) $1-
    dec %x
  }
}	

ur's is wrong deal with it....

Quote

>= larger than or equal to

<= smaller than or equal to

Respond

Jethro - Feb 02, 2010

Regardless of the right or wrong, the truth of the matter is your initial example DIDN'T work. I don't know why it only works for you while fails on other people. Either you have a copy of mirc that relays your personality or whatever. The judges have spoken and sentenced you guilty, and you should admit it.

Respond

Ghost-writer - Feb 02, 2010

Plornt are you god damn blind?!
alias randomise {
var %r = 1
while (%r <= 11) {
say $+($chr(3),%r) $$1-
inc %r
}
}

Mine does not say greater it says smaller :@.

Respond

[Plornt] - Feb 02, 2010

Ghostwriter, it doesnt work.

		Code 			
var %x 1
while (%x >= 11) {	

If your starting at 1 then its never going to be >= 11 because 1 is not greater or equal to 11.

EDIT: if your reading this and looking at me as though im a retard, the !@#$ below me edited the script >.> .... And still failed

If your so badly wanting to do it like the posters then:

		Code 			
Alias randomize {
var %x 1
while (%x <= 11) {
msg $chan $+($chr(3),$calc(11- %x)) $1-
inc %x
}
}
	

That will do the colours backwards...

(i hope)

Respond

Ghost-writer - Feb 02, 2010

There is no issue! Gummo, what the hell are you talking about?! It works perfectly fine, load it in your remote. In the script displayed it goes up to 11, excatly what mine did. And jethros goes from 11-1 whitch means he did it oppisite of the posters. Im right jethro, your wrong. Look into it.

Respond

Jethro - Feb 01, 2010

Ghost-writer, before you alibied yourself, have you looked at your example closely and sought out the issue why it's not working? Thanks to Gummo, he pointed out the culprit for you.

The $$ will make sure the $1- is typed, or else you will get 11 empty lines upon entering /randomise only.

Respond

Gummo - Feb 01, 2010

No, Ghost-writer, your while loop was effective while your variable was >= 11 and you decreased it from 1 - it would never do anything..

Respond

Ghost-writer - Feb 01, 2010

Wtf jethro? You reversed it and added a $ to make sure theres a $1-, big deal???

Respond

TheNitelyfe - Jan 31, 2010

JETHRO'S ON A ROLL HERE

Respond

Jethro - Jan 31, 2010

ghost-writer, make sure you've tested your example and ensured that it works. This is correct:

		Code 			
alias randomise {
  var %r = 1
  while (%r <= 11) {
    say $+($chr(3),%r) $$1-
    inc %r
  }
}	

Respond

Ghost-writer - Jan 31, 2010

eh, while loop.

Quote

Jethro sucks :<

Respond

MagicRevealer09 - Jan 31, 2010

Great script dude!

Respond