Yet another mass voice
mIRC Code
+ 0 likes
Please Register to submit score.
| Average Score | 8.0 (of 1 scores) |
| Date Added | Apr 10, 2009 |
| Last Updated | Apr 10, 2009 |
| Tags | mass voice |
Description
Just a simple mass voice with explanation.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Hi Shinu.
is the same thing as
Good code. Nice to see explanations to scripts => user friendly. :)
| Code: |
| $gettok(%b,0,32) |
| Code: |
| $numtok(%b,32) |
Good code. Nice to see explanations to scripts => user friendly. :)
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Updated ;)
Thanks for the compliments :)
Thanks for the compliments :)
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 10:03 pm
Posted on Apr 10, 2009 10:03 pm
You took Snippet #6000. :p
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 1:20 am
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 1:20 am
on
you can make it
| Code: |
| if ($nick(#,%a) !isvoice #) var %b %b $nick(#,%a) |
you can make it
| Code: |
| if ($nick(#,%a,r)) var %b %b $v1 |
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 1:55 am
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 1:55 am
For once i get what napa did somewhat, looks nice and has descriptions.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:00 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:00 pm
However napa, having levels above voice (operator, etc.) does not necessarily mean that you have voice. Though it works, it may not always be true.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:34 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:34 pm
why would you want to voice users with a higher lvl? Only people that should need a voice is users with no mode hence r
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:45 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 3:45 pm
I guess you are right..but how I interpreted "mass-voice" was voicing everyone in the channel including operators and above, besides the ones already are voiced. Logically speaking, I guess my theory makes no sense...
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 6:31 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 6:31 pm
I'd go with ,a,v.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 6:56 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 6:56 pm
? why ?
it's a bit pointless to voice someone that has mode +o, +h, +a, or +q.
it's a bit pointless to voice someone that has mode +o, +h, +a, or +q.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 8:05 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 8:05 pm
| Quote: |
| it's a bit pointless to voice someone that has mode +o, +h, +a, or +q. |
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 10:19 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 10:19 pm
wth nvm i forget wtf i was gunna say after editing...
Oh nvm i remember , yeah why the hell would anyone tink that EVERYONE in the channel would get +v? makes zero sense, it should be obvisou its only those with no modes....
Oh nvm i remember , yeah why the hell would anyone tink that EVERYONE in the channel would get +v? makes zero sense, it should be obvisou its only those with no modes....
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 10:32 pm
Posted on Apr 11, 2009 10:32 pm
/me gives up.
mIRC Snippet:
Yet another mass voice
Posted on Apr 18, 2009 3:09 am
Posted on Apr 18, 2009 3:09 am
Why just limit it to mass voice? Add functionality by making it do other modes too :)










