Tagged Products - 1mb

AMD ADO3800IAA5CU Athlon 64 X2 Computer Processor-AMD ADO3800IAA5CU Athlon 64 X2 Computer Processor

...

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

Acer Extensa EX4220-2555 Notebook PC

...

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

DELL VOSTRO 200 , Intel® Pentium® Dual-Core Proc E2200 (2.20GHz, 1MB L2 Cache), 3GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHZ ,CD-RW / DVD-ROM Combo , 250GB Serial ATA HD, Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 3100 , Integrated

...

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

AS5315-2940 WINDOWS VISTA HOME BASIC INTEL CELERON PROCESSOR 540 (1MB L2 CACHE,

...

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

Athlon 64X2 6400+ Black Edition

...

AMD A64 X2 5000+ 2.60GHz Black Edition Retail

...

DELL VOSTRO 200 , Intel® Pentium® Dual-Core Proc E2200 (2.20GHz, 1MB L2 Cache), 3GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHZ ,CD-RW / DVD-ROM Combo , 250GB Serial ATA HD, Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 3100 , Integrated

...

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

alarm sounding for 20 sec. and key touch tone turned on/off 100 times. Backlight Battery (at 25ºC / 77ºF): Approx. 4000 times when the Backlight is turned on for 10 sec. and turned off for 50 sec. per min.
Address Book: Yes
Scheduler: Yes
Calendar: No
Memo Function: Yes
"To Do" Function: Yes
Birthday/Anniversary Function: No
Home Clock: Yes
World Clock: Yes
Calculator: Yes (with conversions)
English/Spanish Word Translator: Yes
Multi-Lingual Support: Yes
Expense Manager: No
Games: Yes (Black Jack and Alpha Attack)
URL/E-mail storage: Yes
FLASH memory for data security: Yes
Audible Alarms: Yes
Secret Function: Yes
Limited Warranty: 1 year parts and labor
Dimensions(w x h x d): 2.8 x .6 x 4.3 inches
Batteries: CR2032 x 1

I hope this can help!

Athlon 64X2 6400+ Black Edition

...

alarm sounding for 20 sec. and key touch tone turned on/off 100 times. Backlight Battery (at 25ºC / 77ºF): Approx. 4000 times when the Backlight is turned on for 10 sec. and turned off for 50 sec. per min.

Address Book: Yes

Scheduler: Yes

Calendar: No

Memo Function: Yes

"To Do" Function: Yes

Birthday/Anniversary Function: No

Home Clock: Yes

World Clock: Yes

Calculator: Yes (with conversions)

English/Spanish Word Translator: Yes

Multi-Lingual Support: Yes

Expense Manager: No

Games: Yes (Black Jack and Alpha Attack)

URL/E-mail storage: Yes

FLASH memory for data security: Yes

Audible Alarms: Yes

Secret Function: Yes

Limited Warranty: 1 year parts and labor

Dimensions(w x h x d): 2.8 x .6 x 4.3 inches

Batteries: CR2032 x 1



I hope this can help!

AMD A64 X2 5000+ 2.60GHz Black Edition Retail

...

alarm sounding for 20 sec. and key touch tone turned on/off 100 times. Backlight Battery (at 25ºC / 77ºF): Approx. 4000 times when the Backlight is turned on for 10 sec. and turned off for 50 sec. per min.


Address Book: Yes


Scheduler: Yes


Calendar: No


Memo Function: Yes


"To Do" Function: Yes


Birthday/Anniversary Function: No


Home Clock: Yes


World Clock: Yes


Calculator: Yes (with conversions)


English/Spanish Word Translator: Yes


Multi-Lingual Support: Yes


Expense Manager: No


Games: Yes (Black Jack and Alpha Attack)


URL/E-mail storage: Yes


FLASH memory for data security: Yes


Audible Alarms: Yes


Secret Function: Yes


Limited Warranty: 1 year parts and labor


Dimensions(w x h x d): 2.8 x .6 x 4.3 inches


Batteries: CR2032 x 1





I hope this can help!

Compaq Presario SR5310F Desktop PC (Intel Pentium Dual Core E2160 Processor, 1 GB RAM, 250 GB Hard Drive, Vista Premium)

...

alarm sounding for 20 sec. and key touch tone turned on/off 100 times. Backlight Battery (at 25ºC / 77ºF): Approx. 4000 times when the Backlight is turned on for 10 sec. and turned off for 50 sec. per min.



Address Book: Yes



Scheduler: Yes



Calendar: No



Memo Function: Yes



"To Do" Function: Yes



Birthday/Anniversary Function: No



Home Clock: Yes



World Clock: Yes



Calculator: Yes (with conversions)



English/Spanish Word Translator: Yes



Multi-Lingual Support: Yes



Expense Manager: No



Games: Yes (Black Jack and Alpha Attack)



URL/E-mail storage: Yes



FLASH memory for data security: Yes



Audible Alarms: Yes



Secret Function: Yes



Limited Warranty: 1 year parts and labor



Dimensions(w x h x d): 2.8 x .6 x 4.3 inches



Batteries: CR2032 x 1







I hope this can help!

Intel E2180 Pentium Dual Core LGA775 Socket 2.0GHz 1MB L2 Cache Processor

...

good when trying to look at a processor.

While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU...same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically.

But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores.
If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors).
The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz
The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz
The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz
The more you raise the FSB - the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal.

These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz - 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000's 2MB, and E6000's 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance.
Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians.

When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000's, the E4000's, the E6000's, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000's; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy.
Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000's are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 - $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines.

Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING.
These processors (E2000) are not on the same level...but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc...no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research.

Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000's 1MB to the E4000's 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die).
(Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000's/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000's & Q6000....better yet the E8000's & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000's & E4000's don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000's & Q9000's will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000's & Q6000's.
That's one more thing to point out. The E2000's will draw the least power at stock although the new (E8400 line's power reduction technology gives you a much faster stock speed at low energy usage).

Full Disclosure: I own an E6750, an E4400, and an E2180. I intend to purchase an E8400 when the prices stabalize & supplies increase. Look for the buying/price point to drop to Tray (price per 1000CPUs) of $183 within a few months.

Garmin FRS/GMRS Waterproof 2-Mile, 2-Way Radio/WAAS-Enabled GPS with 1MB Open Memory - Yellow/Black

...

good when trying to look at a processor.



While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU...same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically.



But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores.

If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors).

The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz

The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz

The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz

The more you raise the FSB - the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal.



These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz - 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000's 2MB, and E6000's 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance.

Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians.



When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000's, the E4000's, the E6000's, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000's; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy.

Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000's are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 - $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines.



Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING.

These processors (E2000) are not on the same level...but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc...no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research.



Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000's 1MB to the E4000's 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die).

(Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000's/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000's & Q6000....better yet the E8000's & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000's & E4000's don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000's & Q9000's will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000's & Q6000's.

That's one more thing to point out. The E2000's will draw the least power at stock although the new (E8400 line's power reduction technology gives you a much faster stock speed at low energy usage).



Full Disclosure: I own an E6750, an E4400, and an E2180. I intend to purchase an E8400 when the prices stabalize & supplies increase. Look for the buying/price point to drop to Tray (price per 1000CPUs) of $183 within a few months.

Athlon 64X2 6400+ Black Edition

...

good when trying to look at a processor.





While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU...same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically.





But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores.


If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors).


The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz


The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz


The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz


The more you raise the FSB - the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal.





These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz - 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000's 2MB, and E6000's 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance.


Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians.





When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000's, the E4000's, the E6000's, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000's; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy.


Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000's are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 - $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines.





Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING.


These processors (E2000) are not on the same level...but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc...no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research.





Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000's 1MB to the E4000's 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die).


(Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000's/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000's & Q6000....better yet the E8000's & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000's & E4000's don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000's & Q9000's will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000's & Q6000's.


That's one more thing to point out. The E2000's will draw the least power at stock although the new (E8400 line's power reduction technology gives you a much faster stock speed at low energy usage).





Full Disclosure: I own an E6750, an E4400, and an E2180. I intend to purchase an E8400 when the prices stabalize & supplies increase. Look for the buying/price point to drop to Tray (price per 1000CPUs) of $183 within a few months.

Compaq Presario SR5262NX Desktop Computer, 1.8GHz Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor E2160, 2GB (2x1GB) RAM, 320GB SATA Hard Drive, LightScribe SuperMulti DVD Burner, Intel GMA 950 Graphics, Windows Vi

...

good when trying to look at a processor.







While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU...same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically.







But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores.



If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors).



The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz



The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz



The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz



The more you raise the FSB - the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal.







These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz - 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000's 2MB, and E6000's 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance.



Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians.







When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000's, the E4000's, the E6000's, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000's; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy.



Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000's are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 - $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines.







Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING.



These processors (E2000) are not on the same level...but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc...no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research.







Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000's 1MB to the E4000's 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die).



(Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000's/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000's & Q6000....better yet the E8000's & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000's & E4000's don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000's & Q9000's will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000's & Q6000's.



That's one more thing to point out. The E2000's will draw the least power at stock although the new (E8400 line's power reduction technology gives you a much faster stock speed at low energy usage).







Full Disclosure: I own an E6750, an E4400, and an E2180. I intend to purchase an E8400 when the prices stabalize & supplies increase. Look for the buying/price point to drop to Tray (price per 1000CPUs) of $183 within a few months.

Sharp YO-P20 Handheld-YO-P20HII ORG 1MB OUTLOOK SYNC ACCSPEDOMETER 8 FUNCTIONS PC-

...

good when trying to look at a processor.









While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU...same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically.









But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores.




If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors).




The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz




The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz




The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz




The more you raise the FSB - the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal.









These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz - 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000's 2MB, and E6000's 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance.




Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians.









When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000's, the E4000's, the E6000's, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000's; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy.




Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000's are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 - $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines.









Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING.




These processors (E2000) are not on the same level...but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc...no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research.









Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000's 1MB to the E4000's 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die).




(Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000's/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000's & Q6000....better yet the E8000's & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000's & E4000's don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000's & Q9000's will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000's & Q6000's.




That's one more thing to point out. The E2000's will draw the least power at stock although the new (E8400 line's power reduction technology gives you a much faster stock speed at low energy usage).









Full Disclosure: I own an E6750, an E4400, and an E2180. I intend to purchase an E8400 when the prices stabalize & supplies increase. Look for the buying/price point to drop to Tray (price per 1000CPUs) of $183 within a few months.