Pros: Comfortable, Good sound, Good Value
These headphones (The SR60i, not the original SR60) provide very good sound, and arguably the best sound for the money. However, the sound has flaws and I don't think they quite live up to some of the raving reviews.First, I thought I was buying the original, acclaimed SR60, [...] However, [...] is actually selling the new "i" model. I was a bit disappointed, as I am highly skeptical of "new, improved" versions of acclaimed products. Often, the new is not as good as the old (as evidenced by the awful Sennheiser PX100-II, which are nowhere near as good as the original).Now, I have never heard the original SR60, so I don't know if these are better, worse, or about the same.The midrange is everything it is cracked up to be. Vibrant, spacious, and velvety smooth.The upper midrange and lower treble (below 8K) are excellent too. One of the few headphones below $300 where nothing sounds too bright or too dull, across various recordings. I can listen to old 70's and 80's recordings that sound thin and bright on lesser cans, and they are great on the Grados.The bass is ok- not great, not bad. I don't have an issue with the amount of bass, but the quality is average. In fact, the low end reminds me a lot of the Koss PortaPros. Not very articulate, detailed or sweet sounding, and things get lost in the thickness, but still pleasant to listen to.The midbass on the SR60i is quite colored. There is an unnatural warmth noticable on most recordings. Again, usually not unpleasant and it makes for a thicker, more vibrant sound than a portable like the PX100 or PortaPro, but noticeable to the point that your attention is definitely drawn to it while listening.The achilles heel of these headphones are their inability to handle high frequency transients well. There is a noticeable "lisp" on sharp "s", "f", and "t" consonants, as well as hotly-recorded cymbals and hi-hats- even when the original recording is not overly sibilant. PX100s handle these better than the Grado, and the PortaPros handle them much better. The effect sounds a lot like how a cheap phono cartridge sounds on the aforementioned types of transients. This began to get on my nerves the more I listened to these cans (I have broken them in with about 50 hours and this has not yet improved). Other than this, the highs are quite natural and not overdone like many cheap phones.Overall I would definitely recommend the SR60i. I agree they are probably the best in the price range, and compared to what most people have heard, they are a major improvement. They can be driven quite well by most portable music players, including iPhone.The sound is very full and lively, and fun to listen to.In comparison to other competing and acclaimed products, they blow the Senn PX100-II out of the water (as do the PortaPros), they are notably better than the original PX100, and they are similar to the PortaPro. The overall bass quality is similar, the mids are much better on the SR60i, but the PortaPros handle high frequency transients notably better than all of the above.I actually find the PortaPro's less fatiguing to listen to over an extended period (an hour or more) than the SR60i, but the SR60 is less fatiguing than most, and overall a modest step-up from the PortaPro.
...