Nikon D200 10.2 Megapixel SLR Digital Camera - Body Only
Nikon
- 25235
Searching for Videos..
Reviews
(121)
0
Before D300 was on the market - this was the best available for this money.
Good for beginners if photography is you serious interest and you are ready for big budget. This camera - is a well refined technical instrument. No 'green' auto modes, only classic camera controls.
It wants good lens. By good I mean f 2.8-4. Otherwise the camera body becomes too heavy and not at all value for money. If you decide to pay over $1000 for a camera and then save on lens - it's like a big expensive car with small thin tyres that don't really hold the road. So if you condider D200 with e.g. 18-70, or even 18-200 VR, go for D80/D40 instead.
Photography is my hobby, I don't make money with it. I'm with Nikon since more than 10 years and my perfect combination now is:
D200
Nikon Zoom-Nikkor - Wide-angle zoom lens - 12 mm - 24 mm - f/4.0 G ED-IF AF-S DX - Nikon F
Nikkor 35-70/2.8
Nikkor 50/1.8 (almost no use since I got 35-70)
Nikon SB-800 AF Speedlight Flash for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
spare batt
Good for beginners if photography is you serious interest and you are ready for big budget. This camera - is a well refined technical instrument. No 'green' auto modes, only classic camera controls.
It wants good lens. By good I mean f 2.8-4. Otherwise the camera body becomes too heavy and not at all value for money. If you decide to pay over $1000 for a camera and then save on lens - it's like a big expensive car with small thin tyres that don't really hold the road. So if you condider D200 with e.g. 18-70, or even 18-200 VR, go for D80/D40 instead.
Photography is my hobby, I don't make money with it. I'm with Nikon since more than 10 years and my perfect combination now is:
D200
Nikon Zoom-Nikkor - Wide-angle zoom lens - 12 mm - 24 mm - f/4.0 G ED-IF AF-S DX - Nikon F
Nikkor 35-70/2.8
Nikkor 50/1.8 (almost no use since I got 35-70)
Nikon SB-800 AF Speedlight Flash for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
spare batt
...
more
7 price(s)
0
I had a D300 on pre-order, but I grew impatient and splurged on the D200. My previous body was a D70s. For glass, it's the VR 18-200 that I picked up locally here in Vegas. The D200 does everything I want it to do. It's responsive, feels like a beast (especially with the added battery pack), and there are enough customizing options to keep me confused for years. I only use Nikon glass. Why spend the money on the body and not buy the best glass possible? Mated with the VR 18-200, the D200 is magic. Of course, they're just tools. Great shots are taken by photographers, not the camera or lenses. Nevertheless, the D200 is a serious tool for anyone looking to forget about the gear and just shoot.
0
I've had a D70&D70s for past 3yrs, approx.I was reluctant toupgrade now but I jumped, I pondered the 300 for a long timebut I decided to go D200, nothing against the new technologybut the 2year old D200 should have all the bugs worked out,Canons new 1dmk111 has presented quite a few headaches itself. I felt the new D300 might experience some of the sameproblems so I decided on D200.Now I'm so glad I did, the build quality is all Nikon the 21/2 lcd is such an improvement over the 2inch D70s andbrighter also.I love the black &white choice, and I can use my 150x 500Tokina as if they were made for each other.So far I have no complaints its a bit of a change to getused to the large menu system over the D70, don't get mewrong my D70 &D70s are not for sale, I use the 70s for hikeswith my 20, and 28x105 Nikon lenses the D200 gets the70x300vr, and 24x120vr and 18x35 plus when I go to a zoo Iuse my 180 2.8, so I feel I'm now covered in all ranges oflens and and bodies, for this I thank B&H, for their
...
more
0
I purchased the D200 a year ago as my first digital SLR. I was very deliberative about researching cameras and lenses wanting to get a durable, professional-grade camera that I could use for many years.Having lived with the D200 for a year now, I remain very satisfied and am glad I went with Nikon (I primarily researched Nikon and Canon). The camera has proven to be very reliable and captures light and colors the way I would expect a professional camera to do. I have been pleased with both the way it handles and its technical performance. Being able to capture candid shots of my daughter first year of life has made me very thankful to own such a quality piece of equipment. Solid purchase.
0
Its about a year old its photographed everything-climbing-kayaking-backpacking-live music-portraits-longboarding-journalism-and the typical sportsthis camera has kept up with it allits taken a beating (i have too)and it still is strongits been wet, its been smashed against rocks, and quite frankly pushed to its limits I'm surethe camera has not given me one mechanical difficulty I'm thankful to Nikon for building such a strong camera, its documented my life and events and not once failed me.the only thing i could ask for is a Full Frame with all the features of the D200. The Canon 5D is full framed and a reasonable price but wouldn't last a week of action. I'll be sticking with Nikon for a while regardless of the DX format
0
I've beat-up this camera pretty bad and I anticipate it'sgoing to die anytime now. But it probably won't. I droppedit into a river last year when my tripod fell over, but itdried out after a couple of days and everything except thepop-up flash still works perfectly. Think about that fordurability...A great and affordable camera probably putting a lot of prosout of business... anybody can take great pics with it!
0
I've taken 10,500 photos in my the first year with my D200.No problems at all. The body is nice and heavy and sturdy. Idon't have to worry about stuffing it in my bag with a bunchof other stuff. The weather seals prevent me from runninginside at the first sprinkle of rain. They even protectedthe camera's insides from several glasses of gin and tequilathat were knocked over on to it. The lens didn't fare aswell... I have a BFA in photography but I'm a girl and I look youngso people often don't take me seriously as a photographer.I've found that people stop doubting me when the hugeprofessional-looking camera/lens comes out. Then I saysomething like . It's sad that I have to use a fancylooking camera to get some respect but at least I was ableto do it with the more affordable D200.I love how the features I use the most are buttons on theoutside of the camera. Nothing is more frustrating thanstumbling around in menus while the action passes you by.Faster ISOs get pretty noisy. I try not to
...
more
0
This is a SERIOUS MUST-HAVE CAMERA! I read that Adobe-RAW was the SHARPEST RAW converteravailable, and it very well might be. However, Nikon'sRAW-converter does a MUCH-BETTER JOB at colors andnoise-reduction than Adobe! SO MUCH BETTER than Adobe!WOW! What an AWESOME CAMERA! Can you imagine what a D3would be like?
0
I wish that every SERIOUS PHOTOGRAPHER could own thisOUTSTANDING CAMERA!One myth that is going around is that this camera has anawful lot of noise. If properly exposed, this simply isn'ttrue. From what I have read (and agree with), the D200doesn't use ANY noise reduction below ISO 400. (It doesn'tneed to). Starting at ISO 400, you have full control overits levels-of noise-reduction, or none at all. As I only shoot RAW, noise-reduction should be your veryfinal step after all photo-editing. My opinions of thiscamera has changed from being a very good camera, to anOUTSTANDING CAMERA ever since I came across NeatImageThis noise-reduction program allows me totake ISO 1600 shots to the point that noise isnon-detectable at a normal sized image, and at 100%image-size is so very low that I am able to take absolutelyamazing very-low light portrait photography, which I couldnot have previously done! I'm talking ISO 1600! At ISO1600 indoor sports events are no longer a challenge!
...
more
0
I LOVE this camera. I used to own a D1x and had a goodexperience with the camera. But it was unable to keep upwith long assignments. I would run out of battery powerafter about 200 shots. This is no longer a problem. Thiscamera (this is not a joke) has taken over 1000 pics on onecharge. This is using the camera to auto focus, preview theimage, etc, etc. I was thinking about buying the batterypack so that I could use two batteries. I don't think thatI will need to. The only thing that I would want it for isto have the secondary shutter release button. There havebeen a few complaints about the noise for long exposures. Ihad this same problem with my D1x this is not a problem withthe d200 if you set it up properly. There is a feature thatyou can enable/disable where the camera will automaticallyreduce the noise. I have taken 1 min 8 min and 30 minpictures with little to no noise. In order to utilize thisfeature you must turn it on and the cost is there is adelay. This only
...
more
0
I bought mine few months ago and I can say that I am about 80% happy. I am currently using this camera with SB600 Flash and Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 lens. My set up right now looks very PRO. I have no problem shooting outdoor, especially at the beach where there is good amount of light. Shooting indoor with my 17-55mm f/2.8 makes me frustrated. My friend was shooting beside me using his Canon 30D and 17-55mm f/2.8 Canon lens. We have the same high ISO setting but Canon's pic came out low noise. Mine came out very grainy, I ended up deleting the pic and taking another shot using the flash. So if you are buying this and intending to use outdoor, go ahead buy it. If intended to use indoor without flash, try it first before you buy it. OTHER ADVANTAGES OF NIKON D200: you will have quick access to all settings. It is heavily built. It looks very PRO compared to other brands in its class or price range. I will also suggest to buy DVD instructional. The users manual is very thick. Battery is only good
...
more
0
I have been in photography over 30 years and have owned many Nikons and a Canon or two. I have to say this is the best camera for the price of anything I have owned in that 30+ years, including the pro Nikon film bodies (F series)!The single best feature on this camera is the ergonomics. Everything is right where you want it, not buried in a menu bank! It is simple to use. This is a plus whether you are a pro or amature.If you have never owned a DSLR this might be a little over your head. Go with the D40x or D80. If you are thinking of upgrading....do it! You won't regret it.I must say that I only shoot RAW (NEF files) though. If you are looking for something that spits out terrific jpegs right out of the camera you may be a little disappointed. I don't believe this camera was designed for that. The image quality (IQ) is astonishing. I print portraits as large as 16x20 using ISO 400 and my clients are very happy. Buy it, have fun with it and don't look back. Even with the pending
...
more
0
There is probably not much to say that has not already been said. The Nikon D200 is, like all of Nikon's prosumer/professional cameras, designed to be the photographers tool. I had been looking at the Canon 5D as well, but for purposes of cost, weather sealing (the gasketinig is a confidence booster in adverse conditions), and layout/design, the Nikon D200 seems to be a wiser choice. At 17 years old, 3200 USD is a lot to fork over for a lens less camera. I shoot completely manually, so it is important to me that all manual controls be accessible via a dial or button. I want to focus on capturing the shot, not on menu hunting. The design and layout of this camera is such that I could use it with my eyes closed (although that wouldn't be a particularly practical arrangement). Photography is fun again. Thank you Nikon.
0
I haven't used a SLR since putting away my Nikon 8000s many years ago in favor of advanced digital cameras. I could take great pictures most of the time but I got tired of not having the control I wanted under difficult lighting conditions. I was torn between the various competing models in the $1-4k range and kept waiting to see if the D200 would get updated as well but finally bit the bullet and bought this one. It's definitely larger and heavier than the Sony F717 I had used up until now. The controls are intuitive, and with a little reading (or referring to an instructional DVD like the one from Blue Crane) you can easily make use of the multitude of options this camera offers. It definitely offers a great deal of control over shots where needed but does a decent job in the programmed modes as well.
0
I don't foresee me saying anything that hasn't been saidalready. Basically, it's the awesomeness that which is theD200. While the better cameras are...well...better, this issimply an amazing camera. I upgraded from the D70, and wow.I also use the 18-200 DX lens with it, and it's the lens Ikeep on it at all times, unless I'm going for a higher rangetelephoto shot.I won't be redundant by spilling out its features, but my ohmy. Oh and the 18-200 lens? Well it's one of the best lensesever. Wide angle to telephoto? I mean wow. The clarity,focus speed, ease of use.
0
I purchased the D200 in April 07. I have used this fast and agile camera to shoot three indoor canine agility trials with excellent results. The environment is tough. There are dirt floors, low light, and world-class canine athletes running at 3 - 4 meters per second. There are 330 runs per arena per day with runs only lasting 25 - 50 seconds. The D200 with the 70-200 AF-S VR 1:2.8G with continuous autofocus has met the challenge every time. The typical ISO is 1600 with shutter between 1/160 and 1/500. I also use the thumb wheel to adjust focus areas from center to left or right leads for the dogs without lowering the camera. I typically shoot 10 shots per run so I download over 3,000 pictures per day during a trial event. A three day event produces over 9,000 pictures that have to downloaded, catalogued, and stored for retrieval, display, and sale. The toughest shot is an all black dog moving fast in a low-light tungsten illuminated arena. The D200 has tracked the dog flawlessly
...
more
0
I have two D200 and love the quality of this camera. However the shutter broke after only 4,000 shots. I sent it in to nikon in new york for repair. It took two weeks to get it back upon arrival I noticed that the rubber pad on the bottom that the tripod mounts to was separated from the body , no problem i reattached it. Second i noticed that the 10pin connector cover was missing called nikon and they sent out a new on three weeks to get it. Attache my 18 x 200 VR and took a few shots the shutter was not working wright ( They had replaced this)looked at the pictures dust spots all over the pictures. The view finder was covered with specks and debri. Went on a trip took 100 pictures in the pictures there were ripples in the pictures . Sent it back to nikon it's been two weeks now parts on back order no delivery date as to the parts. What is up with Nikon in new york This is the second time ive sent a nikon in for warranty repair but this is the worst experience ive had . I have been given
...
more
0
I have had my D200 since October 2006 and shot over 15000frames doing virtual tours for realtors daily. I love theability to have one set of settings for my virtual tour workand another for personal more creative shooting.I upgraded from a D100 to the D200 because I was taking toomuch time adjusting the photos from my D100. I do much lessadjusting in Lightroom or Photoshop with the images I getfrom my D200. Photos come out nicely balanced with goodsaturation, contrast and sharpness directly from the camera. This saves tons of time in the post processing cycle.I did have to upgrade my computer because my old Dell justcould not handle the 16mb raw files with acceptable speed. More megapixels need for computer speed and storage.If you are a Nikon guy (or gal) have investment in NikkorLenses and just can't justify the D1x, then this is thecamera for you.I love the solid feel, and shoot this baby with the MBD200battery pack on it at all times. This gives me over a1000 frames, with
...
more
0
I've had my D200 for over a year and I love it.It feels good, works well and it gives me lots of manual controland great results. It's nice to know that my skilllevel limits me more than my camera. The more I learn aboutthis camera, the better pictures I take.I researched the Canon 20D/30D before I bought my D200. I was tempted by Canon's low light performance, but I'mvery happy I bought the D200 for the following reasons:- The D200 feels much better.- The control layout is much better.- The exposure and focusing systems seem better.- My 17-55mm zoom is terrific.- Nikon's inexpensive lenses seem better.This camera feels and operates like a high qualityprofessional tool that I can depend on to deliver great results.
0
I have been shooting with my D200 for a little under a yearand have never been limited by the abilities of this camera!The magnesium alloy body really does make a difference inthe mass and the rgidity of the camera which is a must ifyou plan on using a camera on a day to day basis. Also, thiscamera isn't termed waterproof- however I would submit thatthis camera is as weather proof as any outdoor enthusiastwould need and perhaps more. I have taken this thing intocaves, thunderstorms, rock climbing- you name it, thiscamera will not fail you. Aside from outdoor photography, I use this camera almostdaily for weddings, sports, and portraiture. The bestfeature is the screen which is huge and extremely good atdisplaying the saturation and exposure of an image. After loving and outgrowing my D70 of four years I wasfinally able to upgrade to this and have found that now I amtruly happy with all of its features and it has expanded myabilities to shoot when, where, and how I like. Absolutelyamazing
...
more
0
I have used lots of cameras - large format and 35mm.After shooting approx. 30K shots on a D70, I decided I wanted a camera that was the next step up.I have 4 very good nikkor lens and wanted to stay within the brand. I considered the D80, but after comparing and finding a special on the D200 here, it was an easy choice.Specifics I liked better than the D80:Frame rateadditional wide focus controltime lapse settingsturdier frame to hold my f2.8 zoom and 300mm AFS lens.4 channel feed from the sensorthe key control buttons and switches on the outside of the camera (not in menus)Weather SealingThese were the key reasons I got the D200. I've got $6K worth of lenses and wanted a body that would last me for 5 or 6 years. The D200 fits my needs perfectly. In use I've found it rugged, fast, and incredibly fine in all image elements.For those few times I want to shoot faster than 1600 ISO, I just use Noise Ninja. Not a big issue. In fact up to 1250 ISO its images are very clean. 1600 can have a little
...
more
0
After 25 years of Nikon film cameras, the D200 is my first digital SLR. It's a great camera! Although all the features seem daunting, once you get aquainted with the ones you use the most, it's amazingly easy to operate. A lot of people have commented on the battery drain. I haven't found this to be a problem because I shoot mostly nature landscapes and macro subjects I rarely use autofocus and never use VR lenses since I shoot everything from a tripod. Of course it's always a good idea to carry spare batteries anyway. That nice big LCD screen is worth any extra battery power it may use.I shoot RAW exclusively and would recommend this if you want to get the absolute best in picture quality from the D200. What I'm most surprised at is the small amount of work needed to tweak the RAW images on the computer (I have both Phostoshop and Nikon's Capture NX). Scanned Velvia slides actually required more work. And the digital images from the D200 are superior to anything I shot with Velvia. I get
...
more
0
I literally drove myself NUTS trying to buy the PERFECTcamera and finally (and thankfully) chose the Nikon D200.I have read so MANY negative reviews claiming that Canon'sCMOS sensors have by far better image quality, when inreality they're so close that anyone who makes up thosestories are splitting hairs but never seeing the Ape! In myfamily of families, we have two Nikon D200s, a Canon 30D, aCanon XTi, Pentax K100D, Canon S3-IS, Panasonic DMC-FZ50K &DMC-FZ7K. So hands on side-by-side comparisons of picturequality, features, and ergonomics were easily done. Comparative tests were always conducted at the same time forthe most accurate test. For the best camera per value,without any doubt in my mind is the Pentax K100D! Itscolor-saturation, clarity, accurate focus, and camera buildis absolutely amazing for its price! It puts the rest toserious shame when you consider its price! However, mydecision finally came to a close on the D200 as its pictureQUALITY is slightly better than
...
more
0
The ease of use and very convenient accessories on the D200 makes for fun and quick great photos. With the optional extra battery and controls pack sure makes for a much easier and flexible picture taking. Nikon has done a great job with this one.
0
The Nikon D200 is one of the best cameras I have used to date. My past experience with 35 mm slr cameras close to the Nikon have been with Pentax and Minolta. All very good cameras for what my intent was (action and portraits). I have had the Nikon for just 2 weeks and have some great photos of children playing softball and of them just in kid mode. I have sold photos to parents with kids on the ball team. The D200 being able to shoot 5 fps comes in handy for sports action shots. The speed of the D200 allows me to catch more shots of girls hitting the ball. More than I could have ever done with the Dimage 7I.
0
If you consider D80, D200, 30D or 5D Get the D200! Amazingly full-featured, and extremely well built. It isalso so customiseable you can tweak and configure it tobehave exactly the way you like it, and you can also store4 different profiles with different settings (maybe asports mode with different focus settings, etc). I haveused mine for about a month now, and think I have finallygotten all the settings and controls exactly they way I likethem. The image quality is superb (I shoot RAW in Adobe RGB, thenwork in ProPhoto RGB), and I would NEVER pay for the extrapixels on the 5D. It's just not worth it, the difference ismicroscopic, and the lenses are more important. Spend moneyon the glass! Also: The D200 is much better built than the5D, and a lot faster in practical use. Try them both, please.I recommend getting the MB-D200 grip, especially if you buyone of the heavy lenses, such as the 17-55 2.8 or the70-200 2.8. I have both, and they are fantastic.Battery drain has been no problem for
...
more
0
This camera is everything most photographers will ever want.I upgraded from my D70 to the D200 and now my poor D70 hasnever seen the light of day since. The controls and handlingof the D200 are superb. Five frames per second makes gettingthat sports shot easier. Another bonus is the addition ofthe MB-D200 which gives you another battery and shuttercontrol for vertical compositions. Buy several sparebatteries for those long outings.
0
This camera has it all Rugged, easy to handle, lightweight, easy to navigate menu and controls (previous Nikon Digital SLR users will feel right at home), 10.2 megapixel for great enlargement prints, huge 2.5 LCD is bright and impressive, all at a great price and the renowned Nikon quality name to back it up. Unrivalled in its class....B&H had the BEST deal because of both price and reputation (BBB certified).Thanks B&H, you just gained a new customer.
0
I have always been a Minolta user, But when i decided to venture into digital, i had to close the book on minolta. Although Nikon is completely new to me I found the ease of use, and getting the hang of the D200 to be a snap My only wish is that I had switched sooner. this camera is awesome.