KDL-46W3000 46" 1080p BRAVIA LCD HDTV 16.9, ATSC, NTSC, QAM, HDMI
Sony
- KDL-46W3000
Searching for Videos..
Compare Prices
(4)
Sony BRAVIA KDL46W3000 46 inch 1080p Flat Panel LCD HDTV - New Open Box
Sony s BRAVIA W series Full HD 1080p televisions take performance to the next level with advanced HDMI
...
more
46" BRAVIA W-Series LCD Flat Panel HDTV KDL-46W3000
Sony's BRAVIA W series Full HD 1080p televisions take performance to the next level with advanced HDMI
...
more
Sony 46 in. Class LCD Full HD (1080p) Television, BRAVIA
Step into a world where high performance meets high style. Step into the world of the BRAVIA W-Series
...
more
Reviews
(8)0
I don't have children, but I can't imagine loving them as much as I love this TV. I never, ever want to leave my apartment.
You think you know how good HDTV can look, well, you don't until it's your very own big TV in your own living room on your own couch. I'm in love.
You think you know how good HDTV can look, well, you don't until it's your very own big TV in your own living room on your own couch. I'm in love.
0
I spent more than a year researching HDTV's and have been really pleased with this one, delivered in good shape by Amazon's white glove service. The picture is bright, clear, and even on fast-moving images I don't notice blur or pixelation/tiling. I had a list of issues/worries as I purchased this - here are my thoughts:
LCD vs Plasma: I chose LCD as I have a bright room, I wanted to use less electricity (and create less heat) and I also didn't want to worry about "burn in" where the picture is burned into the plasma tube (the CNN logo is burned into my aging father's tube...shows you how much he watches CNN!)
Sony vs Samsung: I chose Sony. Great name, and seems like in general people are happiest with Sony's. It's a premium brand and you pay a premium price. I'm sure Samsung would have been fine, but if you're paying $1500-$2000 for a HDTV, why not rest assured you're watching the best?
Non HDTV channels: I was worried about this - I had heard they don't look as good on these HDTV
LCD vs Plasma: I chose LCD as I have a bright room, I wanted to use less electricity (and create less heat) and I also didn't want to worry about "burn in" where the picture is burned into the plasma tube (the CNN logo is burned into my aging father's tube...shows you how much he watches CNN!)
Sony vs Samsung: I chose Sony. Great name, and seems like in general people are happiest with Sony's. It's a premium brand and you pay a premium price. I'm sure Samsung would have been fine, but if you're paying $1500-$2000 for a HDTV, why not rest assured you're watching the best?
Non HDTV channels: I was worried about this - I had heard they don't look as good on these HDTV
...
more
0
A Sony man for all of my TV purchasing life. If you manage to get a bad Sony, boy I would be amazed. This TV has a great picture, after some personal adjustments. The sound is also great. I do not personally use HDMI yet, but I do use component cables for the DVD player. No need to go out and replace what is already working great. I enjoy sitting down to watch this TV each night. And, I too was one who could not decide between the W and the V series. But when you are already spending that kind of money, I figured I would go ahead and spend the little extra. It does give you a little more of an advance with the added features.
Reviews, reviews, reviews. All I read was reviews for days, trying to decide which TV to buy. The Sony or Samsung 4665 series. I admit, I did buy the Samsung first for the living room. But you know, I just was not settled with that decision, so I went ahead and got the Sony too. They are both Great TVs. I can't say that I would tell you that one is actually
Reviews, reviews, reviews. All I read was reviews for days, trying to decide which TV to buy. The Sony or Samsung 4665 series. I admit, I did buy the Samsung first for the living room. But you know, I just was not settled with that decision, so I went ahead and got the Sony too. They are both Great TVs. I can't say that I would tell you that one is actually
...
more













