Comments

Seems much more compact than the one I rigged up a few days ago for a snippet I used to generate MD5 Hashes from random strings, or passwords if you will.

Looks nice. It'd be convenient if it could automatically copy it to your clipboard. :)

Why?

Having to navigate two or three menus just to add or remove a name isn't exactly motivating for those looking for a snippet like this. Unfortunately, feature rich is what attracts potential users, because it's fast, easy, and maintenance free.

At the very least it should have a utility to write the blacklisted names. As it is now, the bl-nicks only echoes a value; not return it. Which means you'd need to run the command, copy the result, add new nicks, and set them. Efficiency is key.

Something's up with the page. It jumps straight to a blank page with "2013" written on it. That being said, if the code is now obsolete, and I'm assuming it's taken directly from the C library, why post it?

You'll probably want to make it more lenient. Repeating something twice is hardly enough to merit a ban.

That being said, this really isn't the place to post code and ask questions. It's more to demonstrate, and publicize your working code.

Careful about using only one "=" to compare strings. More often than not that will assign a value instead of being interpreted as an operator.

What is it supposed to do? I see some GUI components, but nothing to clue me in. Also, I find it to be better to instantiate JLabels (since they provide no real functionality) within the add statement. Unless you plan on adding events to it, it's quicker this way, and saves you a bit of memory. Nice seeing some Java.

Brackets................... This would throw a "Check Engine" light before it even got into a script file.. It's imperative you have a closing bracket for every opening bracket. I've tallied up at least 6 - 7 missing. Sloppy.

I'm at a loss for words at how many times I've had to point that out this week on a number of snippets. It's just .. Wow.

Here's a handy little algorithm I found in my extremely dusty mIRC folders.

It'll allow mode evaluation for valid shorthand expressions. Triggered by using "+" or "-" accompanied by a mode value and parameters.

It's important to include all resources required for the posted snippet to function. I see you call the use of a DLL, yet have no link to the DLL, nor is it included with the snippet. Along with multiple executables, and sound files.

Be sure to "mainstream" your code so it doesn't require an enormous amount of adaptation to operate even partially proper. Personal code make bad snippets to share for that very reason.

Nice, and clean interface. I was looking into some JQuery, playing around with some web development. Still am actually, time permitting. It's a nice "short-hand" to Javascript if you will.

I think you can set bad word kicks on the channel modes itself. That being said, most of these can be combined using regex, among other wildcard matching aliases.

The "Mono" compatibility framework applies an environment that'll allow C# source code to compile to an executable that the native OS can understand. I'm not sure if it allows other .NET languages as well, but it's a neat project for development abroad. http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page

It's a surprisingly refreshing language given the similarities. Visual Studio is remarkably nice compared to what I had been using (TextPad, NetBeans, etc..), and is very nice in regards to creating desktop applications thus far. I'll still use Java for somethings, like Applets or others of the like, but C# is more acclimated to Windows (obviously), making many tasks easier.

When converting a character to an integer value it's already in decimal. All this does is take that decimal value and sequence it by assigning a "1" at the index(s) which add up to the decimal number numerically.

I'll give it a go.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh974581.aspx -- A thorough guide for making Windows Apps with what looks like any Windows based languages. VB, C#, C, C++, HTML/CSS/JS, XAML, etc..

VS Studio has some really nice tools for UI development of Windows Store apps. Templates, and grids of the like. That being said, I like how C# can work more interactively with Windows instead of being bottle-necked like Java seems to be, but that's to be expected since it IS developed by Microsoft. Lol.

Lol, no. It's all Open Source here. Use it however you like.

Yeah, changed it. I do that by default for most packages because I hadn't intended on using them outside the package.

Updated as per your suggestion. I may try to incorporate other encoding methods to add some functionality to it, namely binary numerical systems.

@pimteam I see what ProIcons is speaking of. Using various shape tools produces an effect quite similar to Windows 98 when your computer froze. You can drag it all over the screen and it simply burns the re-sized shape into the canvas erasing what was underneath it.

I thought something was amiss when a simple keylogger was over 1300 lines in length. However, keyloggers in any language tend to be short without any extra features.

So, you're gonna litter the whole snippet with personal code so the user has to spend their time cleaning it up just so they can use it? For shame..

Also, if you're going to share a snippet with the public, make sure to twice over your code and make sure that it's flexible enough to work for everyone not just yourself.

Nice to see some Python, but IRC frames seem to be abundant in this section. Good work though, every time I see Python I'd like to learn it, but never get around to doing so. Lol.

Thanks a lot. :) Started it a couple days ago, and sporadically worked on since then. I did spend a few hours this afternoon fine tuning, and debugging.

Yuck.. AHK. Seems very long winded for a Keylogger that essentially captures and writes to a file. Of course that's what happens when you get a regurgitation of well established languages.

Could be used as a mechanism much like what Wikipedia uses, prevents the text from being immediately ripped off into a plagiarized piece of work. However, Wikipedia, I believe, actually watermarks or modifies the copied text so unless you type it word for word, it's painfully obvious you didn't write the material.

Not that.. I would know or anything... *whistles*

Yeah, I noticed when you click on another tab, then back to it. It seems like the balls get stuck on the edges if you reopen the page while they're touching an edge.