Comments

it seems to work fine for me

you can't call it "good" or "bad" as the sole purpose of $rand is to return a random number and by definition, while highly unlikely, $rand(1,100) could be the same number several times over

its used when you don't want to return any extraneous data, i.e.
if you use /echo $regex(aa,/(.)/g) it would echo a 2 in your window which is generally not want you want so you use noop $regex(aa,/(.)/g) to stop it from returning a value.

its similar to
var %variable = $regex(aa,/(.)/g) so you could perform a regex match without having to echo anything

setting %i is unnecessary as you can use

@Prolcons, the noop command stands for "no operation" in that it does nothing

/noop $regex(blah...) will evaluate $regex but will do nothing else, whereas /echo $regex(blah...) would evaluate $regex and then echo the result

those who take it upon themselves to post such utterly retarded snippets such as this.

some people may actually be completely retarded.

congratulations.

thanks

thanks

not meaning to hi-jack your post but here's my method of using arrays, supports multi-dimensional arrays, and multi-type keys(int or string)
syntax:
$array(<array>) ; creates the array
$array(<array>,index,data).set() ; sets data
$array(<array>,index).get() ; retrieves data

examples:
$array(test)
$array(test,1,this is stored in index 1).set()
$array(test,2,1,this is stored in index 2[1]).set()
$array(test,1).get() returns "this is stored in index 1"
$array(test,2,1).get() returns "this is stored in index 2[1]"
$array(test,4).get() returns $null

imo atleast its not mirc, in the last week there have been like 3 or 4 different pass gens. ripped or not diversity is nice...

it still holds the same concept, ive updated my OOP snippet 3 times, all with diverse changes, this still does not give reason to post a new snippet

even if the code is completely different it still has the same concept.

instead of having $<array> you should keep it all in one alias, i.e. $array(<name>,<index>[,<index>]) that way you don't run the chance that an alias will be overridden

using $<array> seems unsafe as it's possible that you could overwrite existing aliases

I'm confused about your syntax on how to create an array

in $save_array if $1 == 1 you dont set anything

i also dont understand how your supposed to retrieve data as if you had an array "example" then according to your description you are to use $example(index); I'm not seeing how you accomplish that

for your $chk if i understood what you were trying to do you can usewhere \1 = array, \2 = index, \3 = values
i don't understand what a represents so i left it as a constant

what theme is that in your screen shot?

you don't include $nohtml in the snippet

@phil24should behowever the halt's aren't necessary as you could just remove the entire if statement

thanks

@KillerX youtube's source is changed so often its difficult to keep up with it

i hadn't really payed attention to the actual code i just edited KillerX's version, but thanks

i still don't see the purpose in puttin this on a bot

thanks, haven't seen you around in a while Typo

this snippet isn't intended to be used for a bot.

@k3rb3r05 very worthy bump...
i didn't even realize anything like that was even possible

you left commented-out while in $feed.html, and when you have repetitive code likeyou can shorten it by setting the cmd as a var and just referencing the var, i.e.but thats just so you don't have to type as much.

you only need one -m tag in your hadd's as the table would have been created by the first

rest looks good though.

added more functionality to basic routines:

$class($time).date will fill property 'date' with $time
$class().date will return the respective data, or $null if empty

$class.function_name.PRIVATE declares method function_name as private making it inaccessible unless used inside the main alias

it will work, all the []'s cancel out

http://www.hawkee.com/snippet/6377/#c58744 he most likely forgot to re-add after an update